Congress Boldly Rejects Socialism, Forgets Medicare, Highways, And Half Their Own Pensions

Lawmakers stood firm against socialism while standing on taxpayer funded carpeting. Their vote signaled moral clarity, financial confusion and a total lack of self awareness on a national scale. Critics asked if the resolution covered lunch vouchers.

5 Min Read
Lawmakers take a stand against socialism while standing inside a building almost entirely funded by it.
Share article:

NEED TO KNOW

  • House resolution condemns socialism while most members enjoy taxpayer funded services.
  • Republicans celebrate the vote although they walked to the podium on a government built floor.
  • Democrats split because some wanted the full list of socialist programs read aloud first.

Congress passed a resolution Friday rejecting socialism in all forms after a confident 285 members agreed that the concept is dangerous, destructive, and also extremely convenient when it pays for their health plans. Lawmakers called the vote historic. Reporters called it a bold stance against an ideology that already powers every road, bridge, airport, hospital and emergency service within ten miles of the Capitol.

Supporters of the measure said it sends a clear message. They said the United States will never adopt anything resembling socialism while standing inside a chamber cooled, heated, lit and maintained by public funds. Some members even cheered as they cast their votes from chairs purchased entirely with tax dollars.

A Firm Rejection While Surrounded By Benefits

Republicans framed the vote as a response to Mamdani’s recent victory. They said they wanted to set a boundary before his meeting with President Trump. They added that condemning socialism was essential even if the cafeteria lunches remain heavily subsidized. Democrats warned that the resolution was symbolic. They argued that the real test will come when lawmakers are asked to decline their own publicly funded retirement packages.

Observers noted that the House floor looked energized. Some members stood beside charts comparing socialism to historical atrocities. Others stood beside binders full of programs they planned to exclude from their definition. Medicare, Social Security and federal crop insurance were all placed into an informal category called Not That Kind.

Several lawmakers insisted the resolution would protect freedom. They said the founders wanted a nation built on liberty, personal responsibility and the occasional trillion dollar infrastructure bill. They also said socialism is a slippery slope even though no one could name a slope in Washington that was not stabilized by a federally funded retaining wall.

Symbolic Victory or Convenient Memory Loss

Economists said the vote will have no legal effect even though the symbolism may influence future policy fights. Critics said the message was clear. They said Congress condemned socialism but kept all the socialist benefits. Supporters said this balance proves that America can reject an idea while still enjoying every perk it provides. Reporters said the vote was the only bipartisan moment of the week and that the applause echoed through a building constructed with federal grants.

In the end, the House left the chamber with pride. They walked through publicly maintained hallways, stepped into publicly funded elevators and rode home on publicly funded transit. None of them mentioned it.

America loves freedom, especially when someone else pays for it

Rudy Velasquez, Center for Fiscal Holograms
Share article: